These free SolarWinds study guides connect discovery and monitoring with meaningful alerts, dependencies and network-performance interpretation. Use a fictional network to practise which observations answer a service question and which leave uncertainty. The selected Premium PDFs cover NPM and self-hosted monitoring or management directions. Keep the product generation and resource edition explicit; a general monitoring concept does not establish that every interface or configuration procedure is identical.
Want free reference PDFs? Email freelearning@ciscoforall.com with your exam code and name. We will send an available older reference file free of charge. Availability varies. See the request section below.
Browse All SolarWinds Premium PDFs
Choose the learning direction closest to your role and current knowledge. These orientations help you organise practice; they are not official exam objective lists. Compare your chosen target with the exact current syllabus and record any additional topics you need.
| Learning path | Who it suits | Topics to understand | First practice task |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring foundations | Learners understanding observations | Discovery, polling and object scope | Map a fictional monitored network |
| Alert design | Learners making events actionable | Conditions, dependencies and ownership | Write an alert decision record |
| Operations review | Learners interpreting performance | Intervals, baselines and reports | Compare a small monitoring dataset |
Connect additional review material with a specific preparation gap. Open a relevant product to explore its details, confirm its code and version, and decide how it supports your learning goal.
| Premium resource | Preparation focus |
|---|---|
| NPM β Network Performance Monitor β Premium PDF | NPM discovery, polling and network-observation foundations. |
| Observability Self-Hosted Network Management β Observability Self-Hosted Network Management β Premium PDF | Self-hosted network-management scope and operational review. |
| Observability Self-Hosted Network Monitoring β Observability Self-Hosted Network Monitoring β Premium PDF | Self-hosted network-monitoring evidence, alerting and reporting. |
NPM and the two self-hosted listings have different catalogue labels. Verify release, scope and interface assumptions; the original activities do not claim complete current certification coverage.
Browse All SolarWinds Premium PDFs
Discovery identifies candidates, while monitoring configuration determines what is observed. Record the intended population and exclusions. A discovered device does not prove that every relevant interface or service is being monitored successfully.
Practice task: Create a fictional inventory with required objects and excluded interfaces. Expected result: A monitoring-scope checklist. Common mistake to avoid: Equating discovery with complete monitoring coverage
An observation depends on collection method, interval and object meaning. A stale value may not represent the current state. Compare the same time window and record missing observations before drawing a conclusion.
Practice task: Compare fictional current, delayed and missing observations for one device. Expected result: A context-aware interpretation with a next test. Common mistake to avoid: Treating every displayed value as current
A threshold needs a reason connected to workload and operational expectations. A single value can be misleading without duration and context. State the baseline and the condition that would justify investigation.
Practice task: Write a fictional latency alert with duration, baseline and review purpose. Expected result: An alert rule tied to an operational question. Common mistake to avoid: Choosing a threshold without explaining its meaning
A shared dependency can produce several downstream symptoms. An alert plan should help responders identify scope rather than flood them with indistinguishable notifications. Explain which observations support the dependency hypothesis and which do not.
Practice task: Map a fictional upstream failure and three downstream monitored services. Expected result: A dependency-aware alert interpretation. Common mistake to avoid: Treating each downstream symptom as an unrelated root cause
A useful alert provides context, expected response and a responsible reviewer. More notifications do not automatically improve monitoring. Include a recovery observation and the information needed for handover.
Practice task: Draft a fictional alert with affected object, interval, owner and first evidence check. Expected result: An actionable notification plan. Common mistake to avoid: Sending alerts without a response owner
A report should use the population, interval and measures relevant to its question. Compare a small source sample with the summary. After a configuration change, verify that required observations still arrive rather than checking only that the setting saved.
Practice task: Reconcile a fictional availability report and plan a monitoring-change retest. Expected result: A source-linked report and verification record. Common mistake to avoid: Approving a report without reviewing its filters
Complete these activities as written exercises or in an authorised practice environment with fictional data. Define the expected outcome before starting and save a brief explanation of what the result establishes. Verify version-specific steps for your selected technology.
| Activity | What to do | Expected result |
|---|---|---|
| Scope discovery and monitored objects | Create a fictional inventory with required objects and excluded interfaces. | A monitoring-scope checklist. |
| Interpret observations within their collection context | Compare fictional current, delayed and missing observations for one device. | A context-aware interpretation with a next test. |
| Use baselines rather than unexplained thresholds | Write a fictional latency alert with duration, baseline and review purpose. | An alert rule tied to an operational question. |
| Include dependencies in alert reasoning | Map a fictional upstream failure and three downstream monitored services. | A dependency-aware alert interpretation. |
Use these comparisons to find an assumption worth revisiting. For each mistake, write a new example with different details and explain why the corrected principle still applies.
| Common mistake | Why it matters | Better approach |
|---|---|---|
| Treating each downstream symptom as an unrelated root cause | Compare the assumption with the observation before changing the design. | A dependency-aware alert interpretation. |
| Sending alerts without a response owner | Compare the assumption with the observation before changing the design. | An actionable notification plan. |
| Approving a report without reviewing its filters | Compare the assumption with the observation before changing the design. | A source-linked report and verification record. |
Explanation: No. Review the observation time and collection status. The value supports only its measurement context. Missing or stale telemetry is itself a reason to clarify what can and cannot be concluded.
Write your own answer before reading the explanation. Identify the evidence supporting it, then change one detail and decide whether your answer should change. This is an original learning exercise, not an actual exam question.
| Stage | Focus | Practice outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Select the target and foundations | Create a fictional inventory with required objects and excluded interfaces. A monitoring-scope checklist. |
| Week 2 | Apply core concepts | Compare fictional current, delayed and missing observations for one device. A context-aware interpretation with a next test. |
| Week 3 | Investigate weak topics | Write a fictional latency alert with duration, baseline and review purpose. An alert rule tied to an operational question. |
| Week 4 | Review mixed examples | Map a fictional upstream failure and three downstream monitored services. A dependency-aware alert interpretation. |
Four weeks is an example schedule, not a promise of readiness. Adjust each stage to your experience and available time. Extend a stage when you cannot explain the topic without the notes or apply it to a fresh scenario. Revisit the exact target objectives so a familiar topic does not replace a relevant topic you have not practised.
Create a tracker with target topic, initial explanation, practice activity, observed result and next review date. Separate a topic you recognise from a topic you can apply. A useful record makes the remaining gap visible and helps you choose the next activity instead of repeatedly rereading the same material.
When an answer is wrong, preserve the initial assumption, the contradicting evidence and the corrected principle. Create a second example using different details. If the explanation works only for the first example, return to the concept before adding more resources. Review recurring errors together: they may reveal a missing foundation rather than several unrelated weaknesses.
| Tracker field | Example entry to write | Review question |
|---|---|---|
| Requirement | Create a fictional inventory with required objects and excluded interfaces. | What outcome am I trying to establish? |
| Evidence | A monitoring-scope checklist. | Which observation supports my explanation? |
| Limitation | State what the exercise did not establish. | Am I making a broader claim than the evidence allows? |
| Next activity | Compare fictional current, delayed and missing observations for one device. | What new example will test the principle? |
Email freelearning@ciscoforall.com with your exam code and name, the product or framework version if known, and the topics you need. We will send an available older reference file free of charge. Availability varies; a file may not be available for every target. The original notes, tables and exercises on this page are free to read without requesting a file.
Keep the code and version visible when using an older reference. Terminology, objectives and product behaviour may differ from your current target. Compare the material with the scope you intend to study and verify release-specific information before using it in a lab. We share only resources we are permitted to distribute. If you are unsure of the target name, include the learning goal so the request can be understood.
Use this guide to organise foundations and identify weaker topics. Then choose a relevant SolarWinds Premium PDF for additional review. Give the resource a clear purpose: explain a concept, compare alternatives or repeat a practical scenario. Track the exact target and version alongside your notes so useful older material is not mistaken for complete current coverage.
Build a preparation routine around topic review, original exercises and an error log. After reviewing a resource, close it and explain the principle in your own words. Apply that principle to an unfamiliar example and record any remaining uncertainty. The value comes from understanding and application, rather than the number of files collected.
NPM discovery, polling and network-observation foundations. β Premium PDF Β· Self-hosted network-management scope and operational review. β Premium PDF Β· Self-hosted network-monitoring evidence, alerting and reporting. β Premium PDF
Browse All SolarWinds Premium PDFs
Yes. The learning notes, tables, study plan and original exercises here are free to read. Premium PDFs are available separately through the linked product pages.
No. Product generations and target objectives can differ. Match the resource to the selected product direction and release.
Yes. Email freelearning@ciscoforall.com with your name, exact target and exam code. We will send an available older reference file free of charge. Availability varies.
It may explain useful foundations while describing an earlier version. Compare its code, objectives and product behaviour with your exact target before treating it as a complete preparation resource.
Use the product table to find a resource matching your target. Explore its details and version, then connect it with the concept or practice gap you want to strengthen.
No. Adjust the schedule to your experience, available time and practice results. Repeat a stage until you can explain its concepts and apply them to a different example.
No. The scenarios are original exercises for understanding and decision-making. They are designed to help you practise explanations and evidence-based reasoning.
No. Results depend on your knowledge, practical skills and preparation.
Complete one small activity today and record its result. For an available older reference, email freelearning@ciscoforall.com. For additional preparation, choose a relevant Premium PDF above or browse the vendor selection below.